I’m inclined to believe that R. Kelly will do and say almost anything to get off in his child pornography case. First, defense lawyers claim that the man in the infamous video having sex with an underaged girl (a child!) does not have a mole, while they maintain that R. Kelly does. Okay. Next, they ask one of the prosecution’s witness how she knows that that is R. Kelly’s body is attached to his face. I’m just waiting for what’s next, like someone will get up on the stand and say that R. Kelly is not the one on the tape because he usually pees to the left.
So far, witnesses have ID’d Kellz as the man in the video. It’s only a matter of time now. It’s obvious that his body was telling him yes, but i’m not sure whether his mind had any say so.
